Utah Termination Laws

Utah termination laws define the legal framework that safeguards the rights of both employers and employees when employment ends. While Utah is an at-will employment state, meaning employers can generally terminate workers without cause, federal and state regulations set important boundaries to prevent wrongful termination, discrimination, and retaliation.

This article provides a thorough overview of Utah’s termination laws, detailing employee rights, employer obligations, and key protections to ensure fair treatment during the termination process.

This Guide Covers

Legal Considerations for Termination in Utah
At-Will Employment in Utah
Lawful Termination in Utah
Legal Protections During Termination in Utah
Terminated Employee Benefits in Utah
Layoffs in Utah
Resignations in Utah
Legal Cases Related to Wrongful Termination in Utah

Legal Considerations for Termination in Utah

In Utah, several considerations apply to regulate and protect against termination of employment:

  • Anti-Discrimination Laws: Utah complies with federal anti-discrimination laws, prohibiting employers from terminating employees based on religion, color, race, sex, national origin, disability, age, or genetic information. These rights are mirrored in the state anti-discrimination laws, which also include marital status as a protected class.
  • Retaliation Protections: Workers who expose illegal activity, harmful working conditions, or exercise their legal rights (e.g., taking family or medical leave) are protected against being fired in retaliation.
  • Employee Handbook: Employers may be compelled to adhere to an employee handbook that describes a progressive discipline policy or termination procedure. Even in the case of at-will employment, failure to comply could result in allegations of implied contract breach.
  • Wrongful Termination: Terminations that occur from firing employees against exercising legal rights (e.g., applying for workers’ compensation, reporting discrimination, or violating public policy) or a breach of an employment contract may be considered unjust. In these cases, Utah recognizes claims for wrongful termination.
  • Severance Pay: Utah law does not require severance pay, but the company must provide it if it is stipulated in an employment contract.
  • Final Paycheck: Upon termination, Utah law requires employers to issue the final paycheck within 24 hours of the employee’s termination if the employee is fired. The last paycheck is due on the following normal payday if the employee resigns.
  • Unemployment Benefits: Employees who have been fired may be qualified for unemployment benefits if their dismissal was not due to misconduct. According to Utah law, misconduct has a high bar and requires either willful behavior or egregious ignorance.

At-Will Employment in Utah

What is At-Will Employment?

When an employee is employed at-will, their employer can fire them whenever they choose, as long as they don’t violate any laws. Similarly, employees are free to quit at any time without cause or warning.

Like other states, Utah follows the “at-will” employment doctrine. The flexibility of this framework allows employers and employees to end their employment relationship at any time without the need for a formal process.

What are the Exceptions to At-Will Employment in Utah?

Although Utah follows the at-will doctrine, there are legal exceptions where termination could be deemed unlawful:

  • Public Policy Exception: Employers cannot fire workers for obeying the law. This covers dismissing someone for:
    • Refusing to engage in illegal activities (e.g., falsifying reports)
    • Reporting illegal actions (whistleblowing)
    • Filing a workers’ compensation claim following an injury
    • Exercising labor rights or taking time off for family or health reasons
  • Implied Contract Exception: An implied contract may be created through company guidelines or policies stated in an employee handbook. Employees may contest termination if they prove their employer made explicit promises about job security or said that terminations would only occur for specific reasons.
  • Good Faith and Fair Dealing: In Utah, the principle of good faith and fair dealing is implied in all employment contracts. It requires employers and employees to act fairly and honestly in fulfilling the terms of their agreement. Even in an at-will state like Utah, an employer cannot terminate an employee in bad faith, such as to avoid paying earned benefits.
  • Discrimination Protections: Employers are not allowed to fire workers on the grounds of protected characteristics like age, marital status, national origin, race, religion, or sex.
    Retaliation Protections: Workers who participate in legally protected activities, such as reporting unsafe working conditions, registering complaints, or cooperating with investigations or lawsuits against their employers, cannot be fired.

Employment Under Contract in Utah

When employees have an employment contract in Utah, the terms of that contract override the at-will doctrine. Contractual provisions may include duration of employment, grounds for termination, severance pay, and dispute resolution procedures.

Utah recognizes several types of employment contracts, including:

  • Non-disclosure Agreements which prevent employees from sharing confidential information
  • Non-compete Agreements which restrict employees from working for competitors or starting a similar business
  • Permanent Employment Agreements which outline ongoing employment with set terms like hours and compensation. Each contract type defines specific obligations and limitations for both parties.

There are also key elements employers and employees must consider when it comes to employment contracts in Utah:

  • Termination Clauses: The agreement may provide that an employee may only be fired for justifiable cause, which outlines specific grounds for which the employee can be terminated.
  • Job Security: Contracts can guarantee employment for a fixed duration or under specific conditions, as opposed to at-will employment.
  • Breach of Contract: An employee may file a lawsuit for wrongful termination or breach of contract if their employer disobeys the terms of the agreement.

Lawful Termination in Utah

Legal Grounds for Termination in Utah

In Utah, the legal grounds for terminating an employee are primarily governed by the at-will employment doctrine, which allows employers to terminate employees for nearly any reason that is not illegal. However, specific conditions and circumstances dictate when it is legally acceptable to terminate an employee:

  • Poor Work Performance: If employees continuously fall short of expectations for their job or performance criteria, their employer has the right to fire them.
  • Misconduct: Violations of corporate policies, theft, harassment, assault, or other serious misbehavior are grounds for termination.
  • Excessive Absenteeism: Recurring, inexplicable absences or tardiness that persists after warnings may be grounds for dismissal.
  • Noncompliance with Leave Policies: Not following the prescribed processes for obtaining time off, particularly if doing so interferes with work.
  • Participate in Illegal Activities: When an employee participates in illegal activities, such as using drugs at work or committing fraud, their termination is warranted.
  • Breach of Company Policy: Termination may be warranted if an employee disobeys written corporate policies, such as confidentiality agreements or safety regulations.

However, due to the at-will employment arrangement, employers are usually free to fire workers without giving any reason, ensuring that their reason is neither discriminatory nor retaliatory.

Read our complete guide to firing employees in Utah for further information.

How Do I File a Wrongful Termination Claim in Utah?

Filing a wrongful termination in Utah begins with gathering all relevant documentation related to your employment that will support your claim. It is also important to identify the basis for your wrongful termination (e.g., discrimination, retaliation, or breach of contract). You can file a complaint with the Utah Antidiscrimination and Labor Division or the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) if your claim involves discrimination.

After filing the complaint, the agency will investigate whether sufficient evidence exists to proceed. If the investigation finds merit in the claim, employees may receive a “right to sue” letter, allowing employees to take legal action in court.

Legal Protections During Termination in Utah

In Utah, federal and state laws provide legal protections for employees during termination. These laws include:

  • Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964: Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a federal law that prohibits employers from terminating employees based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. If an employee is fired for any of these reasons, they may file a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC).
  • Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA): The ADA protects employees with disabilities from being terminated due to their disability, as long as they can perform the essential functions of their job with reasonable accommodation.
  • Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA): The ADEA protects employees aged 40 and over from termination based on their age. It is illegal for employers to make employment decisions based on age discrimination, including firing.
  • Utah Antidiscrimination Act: This Utah state law mirrors federal protections against discrimination. The Utah Antidiscrimination Act prohibits termination based on race, religion, sex, national origin, age, and disability.
  • Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA): The FLSA governs wages and overtime, ensuring employees are paid correctly. The employer may be liable for wrongful termination if an employee is terminated in retaliation for filing a complaint or exercising their rights under the FLSA (e.g., reporting unpaid overtime).
  • Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA): The FMLA entitles employees to up to 12 weeks of unpaid leave for certain family or medical reasons. Employees who take FMLA leave cannot be terminated for using their leave rights. If an employer fires an employee for taking or requesting FMLA leave, this is grounds for a wrongful termination claim.
  • Utah Right-to-Work Law: The Right-to-Work Law is a state law that ensures that a person’s right to work cannot be denied or restricted based on their membership or non-membership in a labor union, labor organization, or any other type of association. This law applies to both private and public employment. It protects employees from being coerced into joining or supporting a union as a condition of employment.

Terminated Employee Benefits in Utah

Terminated employees in Utah may be entitled to specific benefits depending on the circumstances of their termination, including:

  • Unemployment Benefits: Terminated employees may qualify for unemployment benefits if they were laid off or terminated through no fault of their own (e.g., downsizing). However, employees dismissed for misconduct or those who resigned voluntarily might not be eligible. Employees can file a claim with the Utah Department of Workforce Services (DWS), which will determine eligibility and benefit amounts based on prior earnings and the reason for termination.
  • Final Paycheck: Utah law requires employers to issue a final paycheck for terminated employees within 24 hours, while employees who resign are entitled to receive their final paycheck on the next regular payday.
  • Health Insurance Continuation: Under the federal Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA), employees who worked for companies with 20 or more employees may continue their health insurance coverage for a limited time after termination, usually up to 18 months, at their own expense. For smaller employers with two to 19 employees, Utah Mini-COBRA law applies and allows employees to continue their health insurance coverage for up to 12 months post-termination.
  • Severance Pay: Utah law does not mandate severance pay. However, some employers offer severance pay or agreements based on company policy or negotiated terms in an employment contract.

Layoffs in Utah

Layoffs in Utah occur when an employer temporarily or permanently reduces its workforce due to financial challenges, restructuring, or other business reasons, such as reduced demand for products or services.

In Utah, large-scale layoffs are subject to the federal Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act. The WARN Act requires employers with 100 or more employees to provide a minimum of 60 days advance notice before laying off 50 or more employees at a single site.

This law gives employees time to prepare for their job loss by seeking new employment or participating in retraining programs. Utah does not have a state-specific WARN Act, so the federal law is the primary regulation governing layoffs in the state.

Resignations in Utah

Resignations in Utah occur voluntarily or involuntarily.

Voluntary Resignations

A voluntary resignation occurs when an employee chooses to leave the job on their own decision. Common reasons for voluntary resignations include personal reasons, new job opportunities, or dissatisfaction with current employment.

In Utah, employees are generally not required to provide a specific notice period, but it is considered professional etiquette to provide at least two weeks’ notice. Employees who resign voluntarily may not be eligible for unemployment benefits, particularly if they leave without good cause or because of personal preference rather than external pressures.

Involuntary Resignations

An involuntary resignation, or constructive discharge, happens when an employee feels compelled to resign due to intolerable working conditions, such as harassment, discrimination, or significant changes in job responsibilities that make continued employment intolerable.

In Utah, employees who resign under these circumstances may have a stronger case for unemployment benefits, as they can argue that they had no reasonable choice but to leave their position. It is important for employees in such situations to document their experiences and seek legal advice to explore potential claims against the employer.

Legal Cases Related to Wrongful Termination in Utah

1. Staffing Firm Pays $62,500 in Retaliation Settlement After Firing Employee Who Supported Sexual Harassment Complaint

In the case of EEOC v. Adecco USA Inc., Jeffrey Byard, a former office supervisor at Adecco’s Utah office, was fired after he supported his supervisor’s sexual harassment complaint.

Byard’s supervisor alleged harassment by her boss, and when Byard voiced out in support, Adecco retaliated by disciplining and eventually terminating him in March 2003.

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) filed a lawsuit in U.S. District Court for the District of Utah, alleging that Byard’s termination violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which protects employees from retaliation when they participate in discrimination investigations.

After years of litigation, Adecco agreed to a $62,500 settlement and committed to training its employees on retaliation laws.

Key Lessons Learned from this Case:

  • Retaliation against employees who support discrimination claims is illegal under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
  • Employers must ensure that employees feel safe to participate in or support discrimination investigations without fear of retaliation.
  • It is important for employers to offer training and education on retaliation laws to avoid legal disputes and foster a fair workplace environment.

2. Utah Japanese Restaurant Settles Pregnancy Discrimination Suit for $30,000

In EEOC v. Teppanyaki of Clearfield LLC, the EEOC filed a lawsuit against Tepanyaki, a Japanese restaurant in Utah, for unlawfully firing Alison Woodbury due to her pregnancy.

Woodbury, hired as a server, was terminated during her initial training after the restaurant discovered she was pregnant. The EEOC alleged that Tepanyaki’s actions violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits discrimination based on sex, including pregnancy. Federal law mandates that pregnant employees must be allowed to continue working as long as they can perform their duties.

The case resulted in a $30,000 settlement for Woodbury and required Tepanyaki to implement employee training on sex and pregnancy discrimination.

Key Lessons Learned from this Case:

  • Terminating employees based on pregnancy violates federal law and can result in significant financial penalties.
  • Employers must dispel myths and stereotypes that automatically categorize pregnant employees as unfit for work.
  • Implementing training and clear policies on pregnancy discrimination is essential to fostering a fair and inclusive workplace.

3. Pizza Restaurant Chain Settles Disability Discrimination Suit for $125,000 After Firing Employee with Job Coach

In EEOC v. Papa John’s Utah LLC, the EEOC filed a lawsuit against the owners of Papa John’s Pizza in Farmington, Utah, for discriminating against Scott Bonn, an employee with a disability.

Bonn, who has Down syndrome, was successfully employed at the pizza restaurant for over five months with the assistance of a job coach, a reasonable accommodation under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

However, after an operating partner observed Bonn working with his job coach, he ordered local management to fire Bonn, claiming the job coach was unnecessary. This led to the EEOC’s lawsuit, highlighting that such actions violate Title I of the ADA, which prohibits discrimination against qualified individuals with disabilities and mandates reasonable accommodations when needed.

The settlement requires Papa John’s to pay Bonn $125,000, revise its equal employment opportunity policies, provide training for management and HR staff across its Utah locations, and establish a recruitment program catered for individuals with disabilities.

Key Lessons Learned from this Case:

  • Employers are legally obligated to provide reasonable accommodations for employees with disabilities, including using job coaches when appropriate.
  • Discrimination based on an employee’s disability undermines workplace inclusion and violates federal law.
  • Employers are advised to implement training and outreach programs to enhance the employees’ understanding of the value of individuals with disabilities to the workforce and foster a more diverse and inclusive work environment.

4. Nursing Home Operator Settles Pregnancy Discrimination Lawsuit for $22,000

In EEOC v. Beehive of Vernal, Inc., the EEOC sued Beehive of Vernal, a nursing home operator in Vernal, Utah, for unlawfully discriminating against two assistant managers because of their pregnancies.

The lawsuit alleged that the owner of Beehive offered an assistant manager’s position to another employee after learning about the original assistant manager’s pregnancy. He further subjected the pregnant employee to excessive scrutiny and repeatedly questioned her about when she planned to stop working, ultimately leading her to resign.

In a similar situation, another assistant manager faced demotion and was effectively terminated when she was no longer scheduled for work after revealing her pregnancy.

Such actions constitute a violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended by the Pregnancy Discrimination Act (PDA), which prohibits discrimination based on pregnancy. After attempts to resolve the issue through conciliation, the EEOC filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah.

As part of the settlement, Beehive agreed to pay $22,000 and implement measures to prevent future discrimination. This includes providing annual training on pregnancy discrimination for employees, supervisors, and HR staff for the next three years and making periodic reports to the EEOC.

Key Lessons Learned from this Case:

  • Pregnancy discrimination is considered a form of sex discrimination and is prohibited under federal law.
  • Employers are encouraged to foster a supportive environment for pregnant employees, free from discrimination and undue pressure.
  • Ongoing training and awareness programs are essential for promoting a culture of equality and preventing discriminatory practices in the workplace.

Explore our comprehensive guide to Utah Labor Laws to learn more.

Important Cautionary Note

This content is provided for informational purposes only. While we make every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information presented, we cannot guarantee that it is free of errors or omissions. Users are advised to independently verify any critical information and should not solely rely on the content provided.